Where Tetroneira sought to experience the patterns created by the interaction of Monads in the physical, Pemptoneira sought to understand these patterns and gain facility in manipulating them.
ust as Protoneira studied the patterns of being and Deuteroneira sought practical application of them, so Tetroneira studied interactive patterns while Pemptoneira sought practical understanding of them. Thus we see the same pattern repeating at a different octave.
Observational and analytical where Tetroneira was subjective, Pemptoneira seeks to know and to understand existence in all its facets –especially the relationships between things. Curiosity is Pemptoneira’s overriding characteristic, and study is its primary application.
Where Deuteroneira sought to understand things in terms of practical effects, Pemptoneira seeks to understand cause. Effects are a secondary concern to Pemptoneira –though not to say unimportant.
Where the Tetroneiran Soul throws itself fully into each experience and forms long lasting attachments, the Pemptoneiran Soul tends to be aloof and reserved from its experiences, and constantly revises its attachments as its understandings change. The Pemptoneiran Soul is not passionate about its experiences so much as about its understandings.
Ektoneira –Having examined the physical from the perspective of relationships and causes through Pemptoneira, Deity sought to put this knowledge into practical use. However the same objectivity which gave Pemptoneira enough distance to understand these things made it impossible for her to make the best use of that knowledge. Pemptoneira was by nature aloof, an observer created to study at a distance –she could not engage enough to apply the knowledge she had gained.
Where Protoneira sought to understand patterns, Deuteroneira sought to apply those understandings and Tritoneira sought to put those applications into practice, Tetroneira sought to understand relationships, Pemptoneira sought to analyze relationships, and Ektoneira seeks to put the understanding of relationships into practice.
Each new Monad was a microcosm of Deity at the moment of its creation. As each Monad went forward Deity experienced the physical through them, and She was changed. The experiences of each Monad changed the perspective of Deity, causing Her to create the next Monad based upon the needs of its predecessors. In addition, the creation of each successive Monad affected its predecessors through interaction, creating a progressively evolving experience of existence.
In creating Ektoneira, Deity combined the subjectivity of Tetroneira and the objectivity of Pemptoneira in an attempt to achieve balance.
Like Tetroneira and Pemptoneira, Ektoneira is primarily concerned with relationships. Ektoneira might be considered a kind of scientist of relationships, seeking to create and experience good relationships by the application and constant improvement of patterns. Like Tritoneira, Ektoneira is not concerned with understanding but with application.